Four views talk about different views of Christianity and Philosophy together. Graham Oppy is probably the
best Philosopher alive, who has made good critiques of Christianity. In this book, each of the four give a model
for Philosophy and Christianity.
a) Conflict Model - Graham Oppy
b) Covenant Model - Scott Oliphint
c) Convergence Model - Timothy McGrew
d) Conformation Model - Paul Moser
Oppy's critique goes on something like this, Naturalism is more lean than Christianity, it has less ontological committments,
and explains the world. To add something more, would require more explanation. Thus Naturalism is best to explain the world.
Reid was writing this to counter scepticism of Hume. He found, the answer to Hume was Locke.
An outline of Reid's thought:
-Locke's system mainly contains mind, ideas and matter
-Berkeley's system contains mind, idea
-Hume contains idea
-Reid denies ideas, and considers only mind and matter.
"Kant did comment on Reid, but it seems that he did not read Reid, but only read review of Reid."
Reid goes on to talk about Knowledge, and examines it. He starts with external sense, analysis senses,
briefly writes on each of them, and concludes that we know, they exist through common sense.
Overall a good book to understand Scottish Common Sense.
There are various schools of Indian thought -- Mimasa, Vedanta, Sankhya, Yoga, Nyaya, Vaisesika. The book defines, Karma as the law of conservation of moral values. Karma leads to bondage of soul by matter. It is the reason for suffering. So the question would be, How to liberate?
It didn't seem that a lot of things are happening in Indian philosophy, and most of the schools are reacting to each other.
Perhaps there are things happening within Indian Philosophy, And I might not be aware?Roger Scruton is an excellent writer. I came across his Green Philosophy -- Which argues for protecting the environment. However, he says -- we protect because our ancestors have left it to us.
In this book, he starts with Science, as the realm of empirical investigation. It stems from an attempt to understand the world, to predict and explain observable events, seeks to ask, "What causes that?"
He says –– Philosophy ought to seek for truth, and abstractions. And then, he goes on to explain
various thinkers in Western tradition, starting from Descartes who changed the way, people began to
think. Spinoza's system was deterministic, and his theory of knowledge follows Plato. There's also
Leibniz, David Hume, Hobbes, Berkeley and others.
Von Humboldt's book -- Limits of State Action is a classic in Liberalism.
He says, what end state institituons should be set to their activity is the main question of Political Science.
In other words, What is the limit of the State?
Other questions that come under it:
Somethings that went through my mind as I read his book were, his argument that, Freedom is pre-requisite for progress in society. His argument is that, without freedom, people are coerced into doing something they do not like. If it is so, then their heart would not be content, therefore they will not innovate. It does seem true.
He also emphasized a lot about focusing on Inner life, meaning focusing on Virtues. He cites the GreeksThis is my writing blog –– I love writing about various topics such as Poetry, Philosophy, Math, History.
Post content here, I do this and that.